12-10-2017, 09:10 AM
Yes really. You selected all of one paragraph that supported your view which is, as far as I can tell, the dismissal of his view. You yourself didn't bother to read any further down the article or you would not have knowingly posted it.
You're just as ignorant as It's Shit but you come with a sanctimonious smugness that's somehow even more irritating than his blatant bait.
The headline is obviously geared towards a view that was horrifically overlooked by the British public for many years, however the research conducted by the Quilliam Foundation is very likely to be solid, so it's unlikely to be inaccurate.
Instead of looking at what was actually posted you just jumped on the first thing that you thought disproved what the previous poster said, without looking at the detail. You are fake news, but this neggy is real.
You're just as ignorant as It's Shit but you come with a sanctimonious smugness that's somehow even more irritating than his blatant bait.
The headline is obviously geared towards a view that was horrifically overlooked by the British public for many years, however the research conducted by the Quilliam Foundation is very likely to be solid, so it's unlikely to be inaccurate.
Instead of looking at what was actually posted you just jumped on the first thing that you thought disproved what the previous poster said, without looking at the detail. You are fake news, but this neggy is real.